|  Lokito | Apr 21, 11:17am | | When/why are stumblers listed as unavailable? I've noticed lots of new stumblers being listed as such, which doesn't make much sense to me. |
|
|
Sponsor |  gladsdotter | Apr 21, 3:52pm | | By "unavailable," do you mean that the accounts are under review? This is true of hundreds of recently added spam bot accounts. It's hard to think of those as "new stumblers," though. |
|
|
Sponsor | | DeepSix | Apr 21, 3:57pm | | Were they recently created accounts on the service of StumbleUpon? If so, how aren't they new stumblers? |
|
|
Sponsor | | blueflameleo | Apr 21, 4:40pm | | I think he means new accounts but they are computer ran fake buy someone who knows the system so who ever that might be is not new. |
|
|
| | Lokito | Apr 21, 5:50pm | | 2: No, I mean "regular looking" stumbler profiles being marked as unavailable (like you would mark a stumbled website that's down). |
|
|
Sponsor | | ericthehamster | Apr 22, 4:09am | Are you in "beta" (for want of an easier way to describe it!)?
If so, I think sometimes you can't see pages due to privacy settings - could that be it? |
|
|
| |
|
Sponsor | | ericthehamster | Apr 22, 9:10am | | Peculiar - I have seen that unavailable message for outside sites, but not stumblers. |
|
|
| | Lokito | Apr 22, 9:16am | | That's why I brought it up. If a stumbler is unavailable, SU as a whole is unavailable. |
|
|
Staff | | CH | Apr 22, 9:19am | | In order to work out what might be amiss, one of the devs will need to look at the account(s) in question. That might be PM'd to myself, and I'll take a look .. or pass on to the devs. |
|
| Stumblers listed as unavailable | 11-16>| | |
StumbleUpon → Discussion![[img364.imageshack.us/img364/7446/susa9.png]](http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/img364.imageshack.us/img364/7446/susa9.png){kind=link}